Filed in archive
Backup
by Lori Widmer on April 5, 2007

The benefits, according to vendors:
Faster restore times
Shorter backup windows
Cost-effective scalability
Decreased downtime
Reduced costs
Don't forget the advantage of less space needed, smaller chance of storage media failure (though it still can occur).
Traditionally, IT managers have clung to tape backup systems for two reasons - cost and portability. Both tape and disk storage offer similar portability, so the main force driving the decision to stay with tape is price. The cost of maintaining a tape system is significantly lower than most other storage options. However, advances in the disk storage technology have made disk storage much more affordable and harder for IT to ignore. Today's disk-to-disk storage options are all touting the same cost-effective capabilities, making it more difficult to stick with tried-and-true tape systems.
For more information on disk-to-disk storage, visit Adaptec and read the white paper on disk-to-disk solutions.
Permalink: Is Disk-to-Disk Backup Better?
Tags:
disktodisk
tape
backup
costeffective
storage
Adaptec
Network
Appliance
faster
shorter
decreased
down
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/61632
Mr Wong
Vote for Is Disk-to-Disk Backup Better?:
|
Rating: 9.00 out of 2 vote(s) cast.
|
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |










